NOTE: If you
have not seen Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, do not read this note.
It will ruin multiple parts of the movie.
Having now
seen Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix five times, I felt it was an
appropriate time to pen my review. There are several advantages to seeing a
movie so many times in a 24 hour span, and although coolness points and
popularity with the opposite sex are not included in such benefits, I still
wouldn’t have spent my Phoenix premiere any other way.
Before
making my individual comments, I would like to establish first off that Phoenix
was not my favorite movie. I continue to remain in a loving affair with Chris
Columbus’s Sorcerer’s Stone, and I
would be very surprised if that ever changes. My biggest reaction to Phoenix is
that it, more than any of the other movies, contained scenes that could clearly
have been done better then the way they were presented. The comment I made to a
few different people is that several scenes could have been dramatically
improved had they simply extended the scene by as little as 30 additional
seconds. The sequence in the Department of Mysteries had no believability;
their “epic quest” was through an unlocked door. For avid disciples of the
books, you know how much additional action was contained in that particular
sequence. The duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort was epic, but only for the
45 seconds or so that it remained on the screen. Everyone in the theatre was
completely captivated by that sequence; it could have easily been twice as long
with no questions asked.
The death of
Sirius Black, the culmination of all of the angst and energy of the movie, was
poorly presented and simply not accurate. By having Sirius die via the “Avada
Kedavra” curse, it took away the mystery of the veil. It made the veil an
afterthought, which is a dramatically different plot twist than is contained in
Rowling’s pages. Finally, my most harsh criticism of the film is the Occlumancy
sequences. The way in which those sequences came about, and the transitions to
and from, was absolutely terrible. It is impossible to convince me that after
nearly witnessing Arthur Weasley die and then being questioned about it for
hours, that Dumbledore would immediately send Harry to intense mind-training
sessions with a man he hates. Those sequences were thrown in randomly to give
the audience the fun chance to see a little bit of young Snape and James. They
were essential to the film, but completely out of place.
Now, after criticizing,
let focus on elements I enjoyed; specifically, some individual performances. First,
Imelda Staunton as Dolores Umbridge was, by far, the finest casting of the
entire film. She was believable from the moment she entered the screen, immediately
offering both die-hard Potter fans and casual movie-goers a mutual opportunity
to hate her. She never changed throughout the film; her character did not shift
or lose any part of its realism. She never came off as truly evil, but simply
so diabolically cruel hearted, it was hard to accept that she wasn’t a
Voldemort supporter. Huge props to her for absolutely nailing a very difficult character
to represent.
Evvana Lynch
as Luna Lovegood makes a strong case for best actor in the film as well. Luna
Lovegood was universally accepted by Potter fans as possible the most difficult
Rowling invention to recreate on-screen. Lynch nails the role perfectly. Eccentric,
quirky and odd, yet sweet and loyal to the cause, Lynch makes the role of Luna
feel normal, in a completely non-normal way. She doesn’t overact the role, as I’m
sure was the tendency among all those who auditioned for the part. She is not
so odd that she loses her believability, but just odd enough that you quickly
learn to love her. Staunton may have done the best acting in the film, but
Lynch created the best character.
Helena Bonham Carter earns a massive nod as
the creepy Bellatrix Lestrange; in a role that, just like Lynch’s, could have
very easily been overacted, her bouts of insanity fit perfectly into the
personal of a 14 year jailbird free to serve her master once more. She was genuinely
scary at points, and the persona she created of a teetering psychopath fit
perfectly into her role as the cruel, heartless murderer, cutting holes in both
Neville and Harry’s lives. Her scenes were spectacular.
What can I
say about Ralph Fiennes that hasn’t already been said? He is a perfect
Voldemort; not crazed with power but radiating with evil. James and Oliver
Phelps continue to create a perfect Fred and George Weasley, and Alan Rickman
does exactly what he has been doing since movie one: making us hate Severus
Snape, and yet forcing us to believe he’s a good guy (which he’s not, by the
way). I won’t go on with individual roles, but there were several other small
performances that were impressive.
The main
trio took some steps backwards in this film. Radcliffe was good with the angst
part, but the way the film was designed, it turned an intentionally complex character
into a raging ball of sixteen year-old hormones. Grint continues to suffer from the absolutely horrible
character that every screen writer has created for him; I have said since movie
1 and continue to maintain that the character of Ron Weasley has been
completely ruined in my mind by the movies. Watson also took a step back in
Phoenix. I’ve always been a Watson fan (and not for what some would call the “obvious
reasons”). I was never one of those “Hermione isn’t pretty” whiners; I always
pictured her as pretty. However, Watson just didn’t do a great job this time; I
think some of her dissatisfaction with the Harry Potter process came through a
little.
Overall, I
can’t give the movie my highest rating. There were too many weaknesses; from
the pathetic romance thrown in just to get Radcliffe to snog on-screen to the
random unexplained appearance of Kreacher the house elf, and finally the over-energetic
editing process that was used to cut out ten minutes of footage that could have
saved the film, I can’t express complete satisfaction. The parts that were done
well were amazing, but the parts that failed, failed miserably. Overall, a
7/10, ranked behind Sorcerer’s Stone and Chamber of Secrets and in front of Goblet
of Fire and Prisoner of Azkaban.
Recent Comments