October 21, 2007
-
Why J.K. Rowling made a very poor choice.
For those who haven't heard, J.K. Rowling revealed last night that
Dumbledore is gay. I won't lie; I was stunned when I read the news. I
support gay people and their right to be gay; I do not support gay
marriage, and never will. However, I do not like her decision to create
this plot discussion for one very simple reason. If Dumbledore was gay,
and JKR wanted to address this current issue in society in her books,
she should have done that. She should have revealed it in the books. It
is an absolutely boneless move to simply add this rather dramatic
detail several weeks after the series concluded. If she really wanted
to display an open mind to all walks of life, (and I don't know if that
was the objective or not; I'm simply speculating), she should have
actually taken the time to work this fact into her story, where
millions of people can experience it. If she feels it is appropriate to
reveal now, then why couldn't she have done it where she told us the
story of Harry Potter? It was a poor move from an author who typically
displays nothing but grace and poise.And also, at the risk of
being politically incorrect, I have a 11 year old brother who read this
story on the internet today. I know that people (including, and
especially, myself) continue to insist that Harry Potter is not
children's literature, but the facts show that the majority of the
Harry Potter fan base comes from children. I feel that this was an
inappropriate move on her part, to basically force this discussion
point on families. It is the decision of the parent to choose when to
discuss sexual preference with their children, and this was not a
necessary revelation. JKR needed to either tackle the issue in the
books, where she can introduce it with an storyline to educate children
about being gay and the truth about it, or leave it alone completely.Now,
before any flips out about me referring to homosexuality as an "issue,"
you know what I mean. As much as many people would like to believe,
being gay is not something that every household wants to address. It is
not as simple as revealing that a character is actually a sibling to
another character or something similar. It is something that will
ignite a political and ethical war of words that will give more
ammunition to fundamentalists and those on the religious right, and
these are not things that the Harry Potter universe needs to be
surrounded with as it slowly beings to wrap up. I don't have a problem
with a gay character, in the very premise of the idea, but JKR did a
very poor job in introducing Dumbledore as gay after the entire series
is over.
Comments (2)
lol I was just saying the same thing to amber and bethany about this. Maybe dumbed down a bit lol, but still the same idea. I'm so pissed about that. Dumbledore will never be gay to me. Unless she plans on making another book about it, then he's not gay. End of story. lol.
hun, it's a story. and a fictional charachter. its okay. let it go.
so a fictional charachter is gay, so what? being gay isn't a crime.
especially when the person who is isn't real.
Comments are closed.